Ambiguity enriches imagination. It fuels
the discussion of plot, incites predictions, and finds answers for the luckiest
of readers. With the best books, nothing is set in stone. As the story goes on,
the author carves the winding path of uncertainty, and it is up to the reader
to navigate it and figure out where the road takes him. If the artist simply
fashioned a straight street, then the road would bore the reader. With
ambiguity, the path to absolution is marked with electrifying story lines and
with stimulating turn of events.
Wouldn’t it be a shame if every
story began with its ending, thus spoiling the suspense? Romeo and Juliet would lose its charm. Tuck Everlasting, although we have a sense that they might live
forever, would lose its trepidation. Charlotte’s Web would falter with its
development. If the endings were mentioned definitively beforehand, then the works
would lose pizzazz. Every novel in the genre of mystery would bore most people.
With some ancient epics as exceptions, most stories prevent such direct
resolution. They start from the beginning or in the middle of things. Ambiguity
in this sense helps to highlight the development of a story and ensure readers’
general interest.
Both a story’s future and its past are
ambiguous until the author reveals them, and the story uses that ambiguity to
unfold either through rising and falling actions or through flashbacks. For
example, in the Grapes of Wrath (spoiler
alert for anyone not having read it), the Joads become evicted from their home
and are forced to move off. If anything is ambiguous, it is their future. But
that uncertainty is what defines the novel. The Joads know not about
California’s economy or living conditions. They only know about their options,
none of which let them stay. This rhetorical ambiguity shows how the Dust Bowl
affected millions with exiles from their homes and set them off into the
unknown. The story’s portrayal certainly demands ambiguity.
Some stories require uncertainty to
function. How will it end? Will he
succeed? Will he survive? Only the resolution should provide those answers
since the audience only wants to truly know them then. As for the ending, some
ambiguity can be helpful, such as with the
Grapes of Wrath or Life of Pi. With
both of the books however, some sure details create a sense of closure. After all,
the Joads settle in California and Piscine steps foot on dry land. Even the ambiguous
endings offer mundane gifts of partial absolution. As for their ambiguous futures,
only debate and discussion ensue.
Just a fun fact I recently learned while reading Steinbeck's journal while he wrote Grapes, is that he knew what the final image would be from the beginning. He worked toward that the entire time. This made me pause and think about points of foreshadowing throughout. Really interesting!
ReplyDeleteMrs. Mac
I like your definition of Ambiguity Nick. I have to agree that Ambiguity plays a large part in storytelling as a whole. No one wants to know for sure what's going to happen before it does, that spoils the fun of being told a story. What makes a story exciting and interesting is its unpredictable nature and our want to know what is going to happen. But what I think makes ambiguity most interesting is that even when we do have something definitively explained it can still be ambiguous. And like you said, that enriches someones imagination, and can lead them to thinker deeper into the story.
ReplyDeleteIn "Into the Wild" the story opens with the ending. Chris McCandless was found dead in the Alaskan wilderness, yet there was as much, if not more, ambiguity surrounding the opening paragraph as "Tuck Everlasting" had in its entirety. The journey is what really matters. The end result did not produce the story. The journey that followed did. In many TV shows the episode starts with the last scene and flashes back to earlier to share how the characters got to that final place. In the movie "Inception" the opening scene is also part of the final sequence. A whole two hours is spent enlightening the reader on how this came to be. Even if an author opens with the ending, he/she will more than likely hook the reader with the ambiguity surrounding the ending.
ReplyDelete