In
How to Read Literature like a Professor, Thomas Foster, writes about
"there's no such thing as a wholly original work of literature." He's
stating that every idea or piece of literature is a spin-off of somebody else's
work. At first I disagreed with this idea, I thought to myself all of my
favorite movies and books that seemed completely original. But then I came to
the realization that all of them have the same basic lay out. Most of the books
I have read, no matter how original they seem, are similar in one way or another.
One of the best movies of all time, in my opinion, is The Lord of the Rings. It
has dramatic fight scenes, unique settings, and complex characters how more original
can a story get? I quickly recognized a pattern that Foster discussed in
chapter 1. “The real reason for a quest is always self-knowledge.”
When
Frodo lived in the shire, all he ever wanted was a taste of adventure like his
uncle Bilbo. He was young, and had never explored the world on his own. He
quickly finds himself on an adventure that takes the course of many years. It
is another story of how life is an adventure and a boy gaining self-knowledge
of the world around him. It is like so many books before it, but seems more
different original because of its unique world. It is like Foster said, nothing
is completely original and the more a person reads the more likely they will
notice that.
I think with originality also comes basic patterns and aspects, Sam. I find it intriguing that some of the most spectacular, fascinating, and amazing works of literature and films are able to have the same basic format along with similar trials and problems placed in similar locations of that specific story. It is truly a wonder how these works of art are able to become classics with such a capability of using the same pattern. Maybe the patterns of literature are truly made for success and inspiration for the reader.
ReplyDelete